Beyond Monogamy: Understanding Ethical Non-Monogamy (ENM), Open and Polyamorous Relationships
Originally published on 2.10.2025
Reading time: 8 minutes

The choice of monogamy has long been the foundation of our Western societies, a model sometimes imposed by law and cultural expectations (mononormativity). However, for a growing number of people, intimacy flourishes in different structures. Consensual Non-Monogamy (CNM) or Ethical (ENM) is an umbrella term that describes relational agreements in which partners decide, with honesty and transparency, that sexual or romantic exclusivity is not a fundamental requirement for them.
This is not about infidelity, but a path based on explicit consent and communication. Despite myths about their numerical inferiority, CNM relationships are more common than one might think: about 4-5% of adults are currently in a CNM relationship, and about one in five (20-22%) has had a CNM experience in their life. This reminds us that love and commitment manifest in many different ways.
The Differences Between Polyamory, Open Couples, and Other Forms
Ethical Non-Monogamy is a mosaic of possibilities, and finding the right configuration often means aligning one’s life with one’s values, so every couple will be a unique puzzle.
Polyamory
Polyamory is the most visible form, a path where individuals pursue multiple romantic (and/or sexual) relationships with the full awareness and consent of everyone. In these configurations, emotional intimacy is often as central as sexual connection. Polyamory can be hierarchical (with “primary” and “secondary” partners) or non-hierarchical, but the common denominator is conscious choice and the willingness to honor multiple deep connections.
Open Relationships
In open relationships, the couple usually commits to maintaining exclusivity from a romantic perspective but allows for the exploration of sexual relationships outside the primary partnership. Emotional intimacy is reserved for the couple, while openness offers opportunities for sexual diversity or to satisfy a potentially misaligned sexual desire within the couple.
Other Forms
Swinging, which typically involves joint sexual experiences or partner swapping with other couples.
Monogamish relationships, in which people consider themselves predominantly monogamous but accept specific sexual agreements, such as threesomes, where all members of the couple are present.
Relational Anarchy, which rejects hierarchical rules, treating all intimate and platonic relationships as equally important.
In these configurations, there is no single rigid model, agreements must be negotiated and transparent, evolving over time based on the participants’ needs.
Common Challenges in Ethical Non-Monogamy
Embarking on a Ethical Non-Monogamy relationship requires courage and intense emotional labor. The difficulties encountered do not only come from within the relationship but also from the pressure of mononormative society.
Emotional and Management Difficulties
Ethical Non-Monogamy relationships do not eliminate difficult emotions, they bring them to the forefront. Jealousy and insecurity are recurring challenges. This therefore requires deep self-reflection and open dialogue to manage these emotions.
Time Scarcity: Frustration and stress in balancing the needs of multiple partners and the necessity of finding time for oneself.
Conflicts with Metamours: Communication difficulties or clashes of values can arise with one’s partners’ partners.
Social and Internalized Stigma
Those living Ethical Non-Monogamy often find themselves fighting the myth of monogamy’s superiority, which paints their choices as immoral, unstable, or harmful. This generally leads to three types of stress:
Interpersonal Stigma: Judgment and invalidation from friends, family, or colleagues.
Internalized Stigma: Feelings of personal discomfort, such as wanting to change one’s relational style or seeing it as “unnatural”.
Structural Stigma: Lack of legal recognition and barriers in areas such as parenthood.
To protect themselves, many decide to speak about it only with a few trusted people or completely hide their identity. Unfortunately, hiding a fundamental part of one’s relational life is often not positive for mental health and relationship quality.
For this reason, it is particularly important to consult informed therapists, who have knowledge of CNM and can provide the appropriate support that it's both deserve and need.
Benefits and Positive Aspects of CNM
Despite the challenges, empirical research shows that when Ethical Non-Monogamy is founded on transparency, it can be deeply fulfilling, refuting the myth that these relationships are less stable.
Equivalent Relational Satisfaction
Science supports the validity of Ethical Non-Monogamy relationships. A 2025 meta-analysis of over 24,000 participants found that there are no significant differences in relational or sexual satisfaction between monogamous and non-monogamous individuals. This “null effect” is robust proof that the quality of a relationship depends on internal factors and not on its structure.
Greater Trust
Ethical Non-Monogamy individuals report significantly higher levels of trust (as an aspect of satisfaction) compared to their monogamous counterparts, perhaps due to the extra commitment required in communication. This leads to a consequent reduction in anxiety related to the fear of infidelity.
Superior Sexual Communication
Since Ethical Non-Monogamy requires the explicit negotiation of boundaries and rules, participants tend to have superior quality sexual communication compared to monogamous couples, as the explicit negotiation of rules fosters open dialogue about sex.
Compersion and Personal Growth
Among the deepest emotional benefits is compersion, which is the genuine joy experienced when seeing a partner happy due to a connection formed with another person. Experiencing compersion is a sign of relational health, facilitated by low jealousy, clear communication, and emotional closeness with metamours.
Personal Growth and Community Support
Ethical Non-Monogamy participants often report greater personal growth, a sense of autonomy, and the freedom to pursue individual interests. The challenges of negotiation and self-reflection necessary for ENM are seen as opportunities to create the life they desire.
Finally, social support plays a vital protective role. People who receive support from friends and family show greater commitment and are more open about their Ethical Non-Monogamy, mitigating the negative effects of internalized negativity.
In Conclusion
Ethical Non-Monogamy is a path that requires transparency, continuous communication, and the willingness to face both external stigma and one’s own insecurities. The scientific evidence is clear: CNM is not inferior to monogamy, it is simply different. Success is not measured by the number of partners, but by the quality of communication, informed consent, and mutual care.
If you wish to delve deeper into these topics, explore the dynamics of your CNM, or receive non-judgmental and competent professional support, you can contact me, and I would be happy to help you transform your challenges into opportunities for growth.
Bibliography
- 1.
Countering the Monogamy-Superiority Myth: A Meta-Analysis of the Differences in Relationship Satisfaction and Sexual Satisfaction as a Function of Relationship Orientation
View Source - 2.
CONSENSUAL NON-MONOGAMY FACT SHEET
View Source - 3.
Internalized Consensual Non-Monogamy Negativity and Relationship Quality Among People Engaged in Polyamory, Swinging, and Open Relationships
View Source - 4.
A Reflexive Thematic Analysis of Open Relationship Initiation and Maintenance
View Source - 5.
How to Stay Healthy in an Open Relationship
View Source - 6.
Challenging the 'monogamy-superiority myth': Non-monogamous people report just-as-happy relationships and sex lives
View Source - 7.
People in open relationships report better sexual communication
View Source - 8.
Romantic relationship configurations and their correlates among LGBTQ+ persons: A latent class analysis
View Source
Share this page
Latest articles